What are the Advantages of Implant Treatment Compared to Bridge Prosthesis?

Implant treatment (dental implant) in Fethiye Selin Dental is superior in terms of durability while providing a good chewing function compared to other prosthesis applications. Apart from this, those who have a problem of melting in the jawbone can reduce this problem thanks to the implant. In addition, implant treatment, which supports the gums and bones, gives more aesthetic results than bridge prostheses. However, aesthetic problems may arise when correct planning is not made in this treatment. Although it is more costly than bridge prostheses, it can be used in the long term. 
 

Implant Treatment or Classic Bridge Prosthesis? 

Fethiye implant treatment has many advantages over classical bridge prosthesis. First of all, in patients with multiple tooth loss side by side, the distance of the prosthesis to the abutment points reduces the durability. In such cases, the strength of the prosthesis should be increased by using dental implants. In single tooth loss, implant prostheses to be applied to the procedure area give better results than classical prosthesis. In addition, in classical bridge prostheses, a minimum of 2 teeth are eroded in order to complete a single cavity. However, there is no process such as tooth erosion in dental implants. 

If the patient has a lack of back teeth, there will be no support teeth for the bridge prosthesis. Therefore, classical prosthesis cannot be applied. However, the prosthesis is supported with the implant tooth and functional success is achieved. In addition, removable and fixed prostheses on implants provide higher retention than palatal prostheses. 

In the classical bridge prosthesis used in palatal prosthesis application, sensations such as temperature, heat and taste are prevented in the procedure area. However, palate-free implant teeth do not negatively affect such sensations of the patient. While palatal prosthesis applied in completely edentulous jaws does not benefit individuals aesthetically, removable or fixed prostheses on implants are always advantageous. 

The advantages of implant treatment over classical bridge prosthesis are not limited to these. Palatal prostheses applied in toothless mouths prevent comfort in patients. However, the necessary comfort will be provided after implant treatment in toothless mouths. Finally, even if a classical bridge prosthesis is applied in the area where tooth loss occurs, bone resorption continues. When a screw tooth, i.e. implant, is made, bone resorption is completely stopped. Because implant teeth mimic the tooth root exactly.